Solving low-quality profiles with AI automation

TLDR

Problem

Incomplete professional profiles get 65% fewer customer interactions, creating a quality spiral that hurts both sides of our marketplace.

Solution

An AI powered profile builder that uses professionals' website content to turn low-quality profiles into high-quality ones seamlessly.

Outcome

Launched - pending metrics. Increase in profile quality. Increase in consumer interaction with professional profiles. Proved we can use AI to enhance profiles.

Team / Role

Product Manager, Engineering team, Insights analyst, Specialist AI agency. Research, testing, product design.

MacBook mockup showing Bark AI profile builder with services section

Context

Bark connects millions of consumers with professionals across 1000+ categories globally.

Incomplete professional profiles get 65% fewer customer interactions, creating a quality spiral that hurts both sides of the marketplace.

Complete profile - Maid to Clean with 835 reviews, full services and photos

Complete profile

Incomplete profile - MJ Cleaning Solutions with no reviews or about section

Incomplete profile

Customer problem

Laura, a yoga instructor, spends hours copying information from her website into our platform. She abandons when asked to manually describe her services - information that already exists on her website.

+ Prioritised

Building a profile takes a lot of time and effort

The existing profile builder had significant usability challenges

- Deprioritised

Users didn't understand the importance of a good profile

Example of a professional's website - yoga studio owner with long-form content

Solution

Build an AI powered profile builder to seamlessly turn low quality profiles into high quality ones.

We knew that 70% of professionals had a websites on Bark which contained the majority of the information needed for a perfect profile. We were challenged to build a functioning MVP in 2 months which could be launched to existing users with low profile quality.

Design considerations

User attributes

Existing user, Active, Has a website, Low to medium profile completeness (means we need to design for new + existing profile info)

User goal

Users should be able to seamlessly view/accept/edit suggested info and add it to their profile

User pain points

Not sure what information is currently on their profile, Don't change my profile without my permission, They don't trust AI generated suggestions, The generated content isn't good enough, Cognitive overload - there is a lot of information on profiles

User success criteria

Time taken to use the feature (mindful of loading times), Completion rate of reviewing AI suggestions, Acceptance rate of suggestions

Designing for AI principles

Source transparency

Users need to understand what the AI is doing and what specific data sources it used to create personalised suggestions, making them feel higher quality.

Co-creation

Users need to feel they are working with the AI. They can override, edit, or reject AI outputs - they remain the decision-maker, AI is the assistant.

Graceful Failure

When AI gets it wrong, make it easy to correct the mistakes.

Key design decisions

New Flow or add to existing Profile Builder

Choice

Retrofit existing builder or start fresh?

Considerations

Existing UX debt would negatively impact completion rates and time taken

Decision

Built dedicated AI flow separate from legacy profile builder

Impact

Faster to build, better UX, avoided known usability issues

Existing profile builder showing 73% complete progress bar with About, Reviews, Services and Photos sections

Existing profile builder

Section-by-Section vs Big Bang Validation

Choice

Review all AI suggestions at once or break into smaller sections?

Considerations

Existing research showed us the more we could make the feature look like a customer facing profile the easier it would be for customer to understand

Decision

Section-by-section validation for progressive disclosure

Impact

Reduced cognitive load, higher completion rates

Concept 1 - Profile page with company description modal popup

Concept 1

Concept 2 Step 1 - Full suggestions review page with Details, Description and Services sections

Concept 2: Step 1

Concept 2 Step 2 - Description comparison with current vs AI recommendation and Decline/Accept buttons

Concept 2: Step 2

Background Website Extraction

The challenge

Eliminating the load time associated with web scrapping and AI generation. Load times could be up to 5minutes.

Decision

AI scrapes websites in background, presents curated suggestions. Users see an in product message prompting them to view their AI suggestions.

Impact

This eliminated load time as a pain point and removed API rate limit constraints

High level user flow

1

Eligible professional is on Bark

2

See in product modal to view their AI suggestions

3

Open AI suggestion flow

4

Accept/skip suggestions

5

Informed that changes have been made, ability to view their public profile

Step 2 deepdive:

Messaging rationale

Time efficiency ("under 2 minutes")

Directly addresses the known pain point of time-consuming profile creation

Clear value proposition ("win more work")

Focuses on the end benefit professionals care about most

Gentle approach ("suggested improvements")

Non-threatening language - users maintain control

Result

9.6% click rate

(60% above Chameleon's strong engagement benchmark)

Boost your profile in under 2 minutes modal with See suggestions button

Solution design

Rationale

Separate flow to avoid UX debt and increase completion rate of the flow

Loading suggestions in the background to avoid the customer losing interest due to long wait times

Section by section flow to increase completion rate and reduce cognitive load

Editing on hover, reduces noise on page, providing immediate visual feedback

Profile suggestions overview with Details section, phone number Add button, Skip this step, and collapsed Services/Social media/Description sections
Expanded view with Magic Shows descriptions, Social media links, AI-generated Description with Use updated version and Finish buttons

Customer testing

From 6 moderated interviews we grew confidence in our design decisions.

The solution was successfully validated across 4 areas

Source attribution

Users clearly understood content came from their website

Information hierarchy

Distinguished existing vs suggested content

Interaction model

Knew how to edit and add suggestions

User control

Understood they could skip suggestions entirely

Changes from customer testing

Initial modal messaging about 'incomplete profiles' created negative priming. Reframing to focus on 'suggestions' and 'improvements' significantly improved user receptivity.

"This would have saved me so much time copying and pasting from my website"

"I can't believe how fast it was."

Figma prototype used for testing

Outcomes

Just launched, awaiting full results. Preliminary results include:

+ Achieved 80% conversion rate - significantly outperforming typical profile creation benchmarks of 20-40%

+ A professional can take their profile from blank to medium quality in about 1 minute, saving them time and improving the marketplace experience for buyers.

+ De-risked AI investment

+ Scalable pattern for AI profile creator to build on